Корисник:Admin/Report: Bojana Wiki PG/Wikimedia Start Republika Srpska 2016 — разлика између измена

Извор: Викимедијина заједница Републике Српске
(Lessons learned)
Ред 65: Ред 65:
 
<!---What lessons were learned that may help others succeed in similar projects? Consider the following questions and respond with 1 - 2 short paragraphs. --->
 
<!---What lessons were learned that may help others succeed in similar projects? Consider the following questions and respond with 1 - 2 short paragraphs. --->
 
:;What worked well?
 
:;What worked well?
:PLACEHOLDER TEXT
+
:Enthusiasm and motivation of the community was significantly improved. After birthday celebration and conference, Wikimedia community of the Republic of Srpska held a meeting to discuss further plans. One of the topics concerned future projects and group improvement. Initial framework was formulated for ten new projects with further increase in group cohesion and capacity building so community could, in further period begin process of transformation into official Chapter.
 +
 
 +
:Strong bond was established with interested educational institutions in regards of creation and implementation of WikiEdu programs.
 +
 
 +
:Among the participants there was several of them with certain reserves when it come to the issues of Wikipedia, its basic functions, reliability but during the two day program they expressed interest in the whole Wiki network working behind the actual site of the encyclopedia. Later on, they did create their own accounts.
 +
 
 
:;What didn't work?
 
:;What didn't work?
:PLACEHOLDER TEXT
+
:Planned activities where realized in accordance with the plan and there was no problems during their realization. Only setback came in the shape of the final price for the birthday cake. During initial planning, prices taken into account were those of the festive and New Year period, which are somewhat higher than usual. Contradictory to the planned budget, some items were more expensive than in the initial agreement while in others we managed to save certain percentage of our financial resources given that we managed to receive discount on certain items. The problematic cake price was augmented from other sources and our own funds. Birthday cake, to certain degree, diverged from the planned and agreed outlook, but it still did comply with visual recognizable Wikipedia imagery.
 
:;What would you do differently if you planned a similar project? <!---Please also include if you would measure the success of the project differently--->
 
:;What would you do differently if you planned a similar project? <!---Please also include if you would measure the success of the project differently--->
:PLACEHOLDER TEXT
+
:Organizational plan and its realization were good and were implemented without significant problems. Every phase went according with the plan.
  
 
=== Learning patterns ===
 
=== Learning patterns ===

Измена од 24. фебруар 2016. у 03:08


Шаблон:Grant report 


Project status

Did you comply with the requirements specified by WMF in the grant agreement?
YES
Is your project completed?
YES

Activities and lessons learned

Activities

  • Preparations: Initial steps in development and realization of the project Wikimedia Start 2016 required significant preparations for the event itself. First steps required selection and activation of the organization team from the members of the Wikimedia Community of the Republic of Srpska which would coordinate the project. Team was composed from three community members: Ljubiša Malenica, Radenko Đoković and Bojana Podgorica.

After communication with the WMF was established, project proposal was written in accordance with requests and applicable standards. It was necessary to, parallel with project proposal creation, verify domestic prices of services and products so the most favorable decision, in financial sense, could be reached when it comes to the issues of accommodation, food, technical aids and similar. As planned, this was done. Community decided that the event will be organized in the city of East Sarajevo, one of the largest regional centers in the Republic of Srpska.

  • Program: In specially created questionnaire, community had the opportunity to suggest potential themes of the conference. On the basis of suggestions, program was created and we started collection of presentations which would later on be used during the conference itself.
    • For Wikipedia Day, three presentations were shown (about Wikipedia, about free content and about local Wikimedia community in the Republic of Srpska) together with two short video clips. Afterwards, the structure of the Wikipedia itself was presented to the participants together with first hand demonstration in account creation and article edition on Wikipedia. During conversation and interaction with participants, interesting discovery was that majority of those who didn’t had previous experiences with Wikipedia editing, pointed out they were unaware of the complexity behind Wikipedia, existence of its guidelines or clearly defined criteria. Only few of them knew that behind Wikipedia one can find a whole network of people, volunteers and projects.
    • Day of the conference Wikimedia Start Republic of Srpska 2016 was composed from 10 themes covered with 10 presentations, two video clips, one video message from the WMF and panel discussion. During the conference, audio segments from Hatnote Listen to Wikipedia were used as well. Through lectures all major Wikimedia projects were presented with special accent being placed on Wikipedia, its edition and familiarization with rules and guidelines of editing. GLAM and EDU projects of Wikimedia where presented together with photo-projects such as Wiki loves monuments, Wiki loves Earth and Traces of Soul. Conference presented statistical analysis of data on coverage and representation of Republic of Srpska on Wikipedia through themes that relate to it. One of the lectures was dedicated to CC licence. Participants showed interest and were motivated to take active part in discussion and lectures.
  • Informing: With aim of informing the public about the event, site and blog of the Wikimedia community of the Republic of Srpska were updated with two notifications concerning the event. Notifications were placed early enough to facilitate as wide as possible dispersal of information before event began. On the day of the event itself, another article was placed on blog, taking form of a birthday felicitation to Wikipedia.
  • Participants: Besides members of the Wikimedia community of the Republic of Srpska, students from the University of the East Sarajevo took part in the event. Representative of the University of the East Sarajevo participated in the conference as well and afterwards expressed wish for further cooperation between the Wikimedia community of the Republic of Srpska and University in the East Sarajevo on the issue of educational projects.
  • Application form: Application form, taking in part shape of a questionnaire, was created and placed on the site of the community, on the page dedicated to the event:

http://wikimedia.rs.ba/index.php/Wikimedia_Start_Republika_Srpska_2016 22 participants applied for the event.

Special page, dedicated specifically to this event, was created on social network Facebook while crucial information’s were displayed on the official site of the community, Twitter and blog as well. Several hash tags were used and majority of the participants shared statuses concerning the event on their own profiles.

Lessons learned

What worked well?
Enthusiasm and motivation of the community was significantly improved. After birthday celebration and conference, Wikimedia community of the Republic of Srpska held a meeting to discuss further plans. One of the topics concerned future projects and group improvement. Initial framework was formulated for ten new projects with further increase in group cohesion and capacity building so community could, in further period begin process of transformation into official Chapter.
Strong bond was established with interested educational institutions in regards of creation and implementation of WikiEdu programs.
Among the participants there was several of them with certain reserves when it come to the issues of Wikipedia, its basic functions, reliability but during the two day program they expressed interest in the whole Wiki network working behind the actual site of the encyclopedia. Later on, they did create their own accounts.
What didn't work?
Planned activities where realized in accordance with the plan and there was no problems during their realization. Only setback came in the shape of the final price for the birthday cake. During initial planning, prices taken into account were those of the festive and New Year period, which are somewhat higher than usual. Contradictory to the planned budget, some items were more expensive than in the initial agreement while in others we managed to save certain percentage of our financial resources given that we managed to receive discount on certain items. The problematic cake price was augmented from other sources and our own funds. Birthday cake, to certain degree, diverged from the planned and agreed outlook, but it still did comply with visual recognizable Wikipedia imagery.
What would you do differently if you planned a similar project?
Organizational plan and its realization were good and were implemented without significant problems. Every phase went according with the plan.

Learning patterns

Outcomes and impact

Outcomes

Provide the original project goal here.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Did you achieve your project goal? How do you know your goal was achieved? Please answer in 1 - 2 short paragraphs.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Progress towards targets and goals

Шаблон:PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Header


Шаблон:PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Row

Шаблон:PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/Row

Шаблон:PEG/Proposals/Reports/Final/Table/1/End

Global Metrics

We are trying to understand the overall outcomes of the work being funded across our grantees. In addition to the measures of success for your specific program (in above section), please use the table below to let us know how your project contributed to the Global Metrics. We know that not all projects will have results for each type of metric, so feel free to put "0" where necessary.

  1. Next to each required metric, list the actual outcome achieved through this project.
  2. Where necessary, explain the context behind your outcome. For example, if you were funded for an edit-a-thon which resulted in 0 new images, your explanation might be "This project focused solely on participation and articles written/improved, the goal was not to collect images."

For more information and a sample, see Global Metrics. Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Header Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Rows Шаблон:Grants/Reports/Globalmetrics/Table/End

Learning question
Did your work increase the motivation of contributors, and how do you know?
PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Impact

What impact did this project have on WMF's mission and the strategic priorities?

Option A: How did you increase participation in one or more Wikimedia projects?

Option B: How did you improve quality on one or more Wikimedia projects?

Option C: How did you increase the reach (readership) of one or more Wikimedia projects?

Reporting and documentation of expenditures

This section describes the grant's use of funds

Documentation

Did you send documentation of all expenses paid with grant funds to grants at wikimedia dot org, according to the guidelines here? Answer "Yes" or "No".
PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Expenses

Please list all project expenses in a table here, with descriptions and dates. Review the instructions here.

PLACEHOLDER TEXT. SEE INSTRUCTIONS AT Grants:Index/Create financial report.

Total project budget (from your approved grant submission)
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Total amount requested from WMF (from your approved grant submission, this total will be the same as the total project budget if PEG is your only funding source)
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Total amount spent on this project
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Total amount of Project and Event grant funds spent on this project
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Are there additional sources that funded any part of this project? List them here.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT

Remaining funds

Are there any grant funds remaining?
Answer YES or NO.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
Please list the total amount (specify currency) remaining here. (This is the amount you did not use, or the amount you still have after completing your grant.)
PLACEHOLDER TEXT
If funds are remaining they must be returned to WMF, reallocated to mission-aligned activities, or applied to another approved grant.
Please state here if you intend to return unused funds to WMF, submit a request for reallocation, or submit a new grant request, and then follow the instructions on your approved grant submission.
PLACEHOLDER TEXT